Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity
A defendant facing decades in prison was reframed through rigorous psychiatric workup and expert testimony. The jury saw the human, not the headline.
Case Results
Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Each case is a story of strategy, evidence, and relentless cross-examination.
A defendant facing decades in prison was reframed through rigorous psychiatric workup and expert testimony. The jury saw the human, not the headline.
Field sobriety tests were administered on a slope in pouring rain. We invalidated every NHTSA standard the officer claimed to follow.
Search-warrant defects exposed during suppression. Prosecutor offered a plea that preserved the client's career and licensure.
Cross-examination revealed inconsistencies in the complaining witness's statements across three separate interviews.
Surveillance video — overlooked by detectives — established self-defense within 48 hours of indictment.
Sentencing memorandum and mitigation packet shifted a presumptive 36-month sentence to community supervision.